19-Feb-2019
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/adef5/adef55fd1361a6d3ab3bd7a8c1dff59a5ef8dd85" alt=""
The
Chamber of Industry of Jordan appealed to members of the Senate to take their
comments on the law amending the Labour Law passed by the House of
Representatives and moved to the Senate.
The Chamber stressed in its
statement yesterday - regarding official or emergency holidays - the importance
of keeping Article 21 of the law unchanged, because there are many official
holidays by about 15 days.
She said emergency weather or
other factors caused an economic burden and had a direct negative impact on
productivity, while the loss of the industrial sector was estimated at 45
million dinars for each day off.
The Chamber asked whether the
national economy needs more productivity or more holidays, stressing that the
unemployment rates in the Kingdom have become at levels of concern and
unprecedented, while economic growth has been stalled for years.
She stressed that the increase
in productivity rates create jobs, indicating that local companies permanently
adjust their situation based on productivity.
She added that the reversal of
this loss on the national economy in the event of an increase in the number of
vacation days four days, the GDP will be lost due to the decline in the value
added of the industrial sector by about 80 million dinars for the four days,
without taking into account its association with other important economic
sectors on the one hand or even Losses of other economic sectors such as banks,
trade and so on.
The chamber called for the
worker not to be granted paternity leave for three days paid or reduced to one
day only.
With regard to the penalties
stipulated in the law, the chamber affirmed that the origin of the punishment
is to remove the damage according to the legislative rule «no harm and no
harm», stressing the importance of a transitional period that allows the
employer to correct the violation.
The Chamber called for a lower
fine than normal in the case of rectification of the situation, given the
employer will bear the cost of returning the worker to the country of origin,
stressing the importance of giving time to correct the situation and not lift
the fine in any way.
As for arbitrary dismissal,
the Chamber asked why there was no clear mechanism for calculating
compensation, considering that it was not fair to calculate the last wage paid
by the worker.
×